--Advertisement--
Ad by The Cutting Edge News

The Cutting Edge

Thursday March 30 2017 reaching 1.4 million monthly
--Advertisement--
Ad by The Cutting Edge News

Living with the City

Back to Action Line

Fighting Municipal Water Billing Hassles

November 15th 2011

Environment Topics - Water Faucet

Ever wonder what you can do if suddenly the water department presents you with a bill five-, six-, or seven-times your established usage. Residents have complained in cities such as Fort Lauderdale, Tampa, Cleveland, Charlotte and Brockton, MA, that they have received anomalous one-time bills vastly above their established usage and in virtually all cases, there are no swimming pools, jacuzzis or other explanations for excessive usage. Apparently, the worst cases are in Atlanta, where city auditors found they were "unable to verify electronic meter readings" because of "meter read errors, equipment failures or human errors." Atlanta city auditors estimated that potentially as many as "9 percent of the meters could not be read due to broken or malfunctioning equipment." A leading manufacturer of water meters condeded in a letter to the city of Atlanta, "It has been an industry experience that typically when a utility does an automatic meter reading, meter change-out and also switches software billing companies, that generally high bill complaints are either due to new meter accuracy and/or a billing multiplier error."

Five years ago, the city of Atlanta began installing automated water meters that would enable meter readers to collect data by driving past a property but the issues surrounding billing, appear to have arisen with the introduction of the new meters. The city has some of the highest water rates in the U.S after prices were hiked by 12 percent in July to cover the cost of a huge sewer project.

Jim Beard, deputy commissioner and chief financial officer of Atlanta’s Department of Watershed Management, said that out of the city’s 127,000 water meters, random diagnostics on 9,139 showed that some 25 percent were incorrectly installed, with the antennas being fitted upside down in the meter box rather when they should actually be installed on top of the lid. The installation failings reduced the range of the radio signals that mobile data collectors with hand held units can pick up from a distance of two miles away. Meter readers had to stand directly above the meter box to pick up a reading. “This is not an operational issue affecting the functionality of the meter," said Beard. "What it does is affect the meter reading process. This is not a billing issue.”

Councilwoman Natalyn Archibong, chairs the city utilities committee. She is not convinced that the wrongly installed antennas are not related to the incorrect water bills, stating "I am not persuaded. In my mind the number of complaints and the need to correct the antenna problem is related to the bills. I would be surprised if they were not related."

Residents have been questioning inconsistently high water bills for many years now, with some suspecting that their high usage could be down to an unidentified leaks. Last year alone the city credited customers with $466,368 following appeals relating to their water bills. 

Home owners in Dana Shores, Tampa, challenged water charges that were up to 10 times higher than usual. Then Mayor Pam Iorio, set up a task force to investigate the discrepancies. Drought conditions, more frequent watering of gardens and irregular meter readings were originally blamed for the higher than usual bills but eventually the task force said that multiple factors were to blame and that complaints should be addressed on a case-by-case basis.

An internal audit was conducted, revealing that delays in meter reading would force some customers into higher water rate tiers. In December 2010 35,000 readings were delayed, with 54,000 delayed in January 2011. It was also discovered that city meter readers were authorized to leave work when they had finished their routes. The report said that this was “an invitation to complete the route as soon as possible and meter readers did not have an incentive to spend any extra time on any one meter.” Meter readers are now required to work a full eight-hour shift. The  city plans to contract a private company to read the city’s tens of thousands of meters. Steve Daignault, the city's public works and utilities director, wants to ensure a smooth transition from bi-monthly to monthly meter readings, stating, "This will allow us to be more efficient and hopefully cut down on many of the problems that our customers have been experiencing with billing issues." Officials say that it costs around $1 to have a city worker read each meter individually. Contracted meter readers can carry out the task for around 50 cents. 

Online, hundreds of customers in various cities voice their concerns and seek advice regarding inflated water bills. Atlanta’s chief operating officer Peter Aman said the city is keen to figure out the problem as quickly as possible and will “address what issues we have.” He points out that customers can appeal their water bills.

In Ft. Lauderdale, the city made it difficult for a homeowner to protest an anomalous bill, requiring sworn statements, and then never acted them after months of requested. Only after an appeal to city officials did the homeowner get her bill adjusted downward to a guessed compromise level.

A Ft. Worth man, Stephen Geis, was shocked to discover a $19,000 overdraft in his checking. His second shock was a a $19,000 water bill that autodebited his bank account. The real water bill total was only $22. The local newspaper's consumer protection column, the Star-Telegram's Watchdog, investigated and discovered the man had been had been billed 863 times more than necessary, for 3.6 million gallons for one month. That's enough fills five Olympic-size swimming pools. It was a brief nightmare for Geis who had to contend with overdraft fees and a dispute process.

Moral of the story--examine your water bill carefully and if needed, fight back. The meter reading system process is far from foolproof, or water-tight.

is actual water use for the month totaled a measly $22. But he wouldn't learn that until The Watchdog investigated. Geis also never learned the cause of the problem until I told him later. Water Department staffers later tried to explain it to him, but the words they used were so confusing that it made no sense.Geis had been billed for 3.6 million gallons of water his family had supposedly used in one month. That's enough to fill more than five Olympic-size swimming pools.Put another way, his bill was about 863 times higher than it should have been.Fortunately for Geis, he had overdraft protection on his account so only one check to somebody else bounced because of the city's error. But before the drama ended last week, Geis had to pay a $35 bank charge and postage to send certified letters of complaint to the city. He also made three frustrating trips to his bank to clear the matter up and made phone calls and sent faxes to city staffers. He says he spent three hours of work time on the matter, and since he's a lawyer, those hours don't come cheap.To top it off, the city demanded that he refund an additional $19,000 that he kept in his bank account for two weeks after the city reversed the charge and the bank did, too. That meant he suddenly went from negative $19,000 to positive $19,000.City staffers demanded it back, but they wanted him to do a costly wire transfer from his bank, which he declined, or they wanted him to come to City Hall and pay in person, which he also declined. When a city staffer called him about it last week, a city official told me later, he hung up the phone. But Geis says he didn't hang up.

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/12/24/3617366/the-watchdog-water-meter-reading.html#storylink=cpy


Back to Action Line
Copyright © 2007-2017The Cutting Edge News About Us