|Robert E. Litan||July 18th 2014|
Suddenly, the hottest tax arbitrage game is the “tax inversion,” where U.S. companies seek to lower its tax rate by buying a foreign rival. The latest deal came Friday when U.S. drug maker AbbieVie announced it would buy Dublin-based Shire. The $54 billion deal follows Mylan’s move to buy assets from Abbott Laboratories earlier this week in a deal that will create a new Netherlands-based holding company. In May, U.S. pharmaceutical giant Pfizer tried to relocate in the U.K., but a deal to buy AstraZeneca fell through.
One of the best cries of outrage appeared in Allan Sloan’s piece in Fortune earlier this month. The patriotism angle I get, but then again, why blame corporate chiefs for taking advantage of tax games that are perfectly legal, especially in a rapidly globalizing economy The big mystery is why it took some companies so long to do this, and why many others have held back, at least so far? Read more ..
|Frederick M. Hess||July 17th 2014|
In May, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced his new $120 million gift to San Francisco Bay Area public schools. The timing was ironic, coming on the heels of Dale Russakoff's devastating portrayal in The New Yorker of the aftermath of Zuckerberg's $100 million gift to Newark, N.J. In that earlier effort, Zuckerberg helped fuel a concerted effort by then-Mayor Cory Booker and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to transform embattled schools that had languished under state control for two decades.
It might have been wise for Zuckerberg to have first dwelled a bit more on the results of his 2010 gift before blasting another cash barrage. For one thing, his Newark gift has not delivered the hoped-for reforms and results, despite the $100 million in matching funds raised by Mr. Booker, the steadfast support of the governor, and the best efforts of hard-charging Superintendent Cami Anderson. In fact, it is a pretty good example of why money alone is not an answer, but can be part of the problem. Read more ..
|Brent Budowsky||July 15th 2014|
In the battle of Democrats to keep control of the Senate in 2014 and win a substantial victory in the presidential election 2016, the new rise of Southern Democrats is a very big deal.
Throughout the South, a new generation of highly talented Bill Clinton-style political leaders has brought the Democratic Party to a strongly competitive position. I call it the battle between Johnny Cash Democrats, who are big-tent believers in a widely shared dream, and Ted Nugent Republicans, who are small-tent believers waving lists of Americans they consider enemies.
Polling detailed by Real Clear Politics reveals a list of Southern contests in which Democratic candidates are running strong races that put them within striking range of victory in November. In the great battle for North Carolina, Sen. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) is fighting back and gaining strength against an attempt by radical right forces to complete a hostile takeover of an enlightened state with a diverse electorate. Read more ..
Financing the Flames
|Star Parker||July 14th 2014|
On June 2, the Palestinians announced a new unity government, which included Hamas, an organization designated by the U.S. State Department as a terrorist group.
American aid to the Palestinians since the mid-1990’s, according to a Congressional Research Service report, has exceeded $5 billion. In recent years it has averaged $500 million per year.
The report notes three major U.S. objectives of these funds: preventing terrorism against Israel from Hamas; fostering “stability, prosperity, and self-governance on the West Bank”; humanitarian aid.
When Hamas joined the Palestinian government on June 2, the United States recognized the new government and there was no indication that the substantial funding Palestinians get from American taxpayers would be impacted. Business as usual would continue. Read more ..
Obama and Israel
|Isi Leibler||July 14th 2014|
We are now reconciled to the fact that in any conflict -- even when we are exercising our right of self-defense -- we will either be condemned or, at best, accused of acting disproportionately.
However, the latest round of hypocrisy by Western leaders, including U.S. President Barack Obama, beats all records.
Despite anger and condemnation from many of his constituents, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has, until last week, effectively been acting as a supplicant by virtually pleading for a cease-fire, assuring Hamas that Israel would abide by a new truce. Responding to their missiles with “restraint” and reacting on a tit-for-tat basis, bombing empty sites, Israel dispensed with any pretense of implementing genuine deterrence.
As critics predicted, Hamas interpreted this as a signal of Israeli weakness, which emboldened the organization to intensify and extend missile attacks to all major cities, including Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, sending the majority of the population to the shelters. Read more ..
The Edge of Terrorism
|Andrew C. McCarthy||July 14th 2014|
What happens when the president who has politicized law-enforcement to a degree unprecedented in American history meets a terrorist responsible for killing Americans he has recklessly failed to protect, decimating his pretensions about “decimating” al-Qaeda?
What happens is: You get the most politicized terrorism indictment ever produced by the Justice Department. Behold United States v. Khatallah, Case No. 14 Crim. 141, quietly unsealed in a Washington courtroom last Saturday while the country dozed off into summer-vacation mode.
Ahmed Abu Khatallah, of course, is the only suspect apprehended in connection with the Benghazi massacre, a terrorist attack on a still-mysterious U.S. diplomatic installation. J. Christopher Stevens, the United States ambassador to Libya, and three other Americans — State Department official Sean Smith and two former Navy SEALs, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty — were killed. Until recently, such attacks have been known as acts of war carried out by the enemy. In the age of Obama, they are now known as “crimes” for which “defendants” like Khatallah are “brought to justice” — rather than brought to Gitmo. Meaning: They are whisked into our country when no one’s paying much attention. Read more ..
Obama's Second Term
Conventional wisdom is clear that the next Congress has a considerable likelihood of being a Republican Congress.
That same consensus also holds that if the GOP does indeed take control, the next two years will be marked by confrontation with the White House and even less actual legislative action than the present Congress has accomplished.
To be fair, there is some compelling logic behind these conclusions.
President Obama has clearly opted out of the role of governing through legislation. He has become the most defensive president since at least World War II, blaming the Congress not just for all the ills of the nation but even for some of his international failures. Read more ..
|Hector Perla||July 12th 2014|
The flood of Central American child refugees arriving on our southern border is not just a humanitarian crisis, it is a man-made disaster. These children are the “canary in the mine” pointing to a deeper, toxic problem confronting Washington. Republican congressional leaders argue that this flood of unaccompanied children arriving on our southern border is caused by U.S. government policy. They are right: our government created this refugee crisis. But they are dead wrong on which policy caused the influx.
While politicians from all levels of government claim to identify the root cause of this mass exodus, none of them have reflected on the fundamental role that U.S. foreign policy toward Central America has played in provoking this catastrophe. Read more ..
Israel and Palestine
The core of the problem is that Palestinian recognition of Israel as the state of the Jewish People would not only end the dream of the return to Palestine, but also of the destruction of Israel currently being implemented through the incitement and terrorist campaign waged by the Palestinian People in their institutions, mosques, schools, terrorist organizations and foreign propaganda centers. Their strategic intention is to perpetuate the conflict, not end it.
The real reason Mahmoud Abbas wants control of the bridges and crossings, and refuses to leave them in Israeli hands, is to duplicate the terrorism of the Gaza Strip -- to smuggle in arms and establish terrorist squads. Crossings left in Israel's hands would mean greater security for Jordan as well.
The world watches while the Palestinian Authority is actively promoting a campaign for an academic boycott and economic sanctions to be imposed on Israel, evidently backed by veiled threats from U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. Read more ..
Operation Protective Edge
|Shoshana Bryen||July 11th 2014|
It is a terrible irony that Israel, revolted first by the murder of three of its teenage citizens and then by the revenge attack on a Palestinian teen, is the object of riots, bombs, and demands.
Following the discovery of the bodies of the three Israeli teenagers, six Israelis were arrested for the heinous murder of a teenage Palestinian. That murder did nothing so much as unify the people and the government of Israel in their revulsion for six of their own. One prominent Religious Zionist rabbi called for the death penalty for the killers of Mohammed Abu Khder. (Israel has no death penalty, but Judaism does.) There was unanimity from the prime minister to the defense minister to the leader of the nationalist Bayit Hayehudi Party, to the mother of one of the murdered teens who denounced the revenge killing, to his uncle who paid a condolence call on Abu Khder's family. Read more ..
Obama's Second Term
|A.B. Stoddard||July 10th 2014|
Just days ago, a defiant President Obama ended his attempts to work with Congress on immigration reform and declared he would go it alone, using all of the power of the executive office possible to change our broken immigration system. Even as a crisis on the border grew increasingly desperate by the day, Obama seemed confident the public would conclude the mess resulted from Republicans continuing to block reform efforts.
But Obama’s defiance is gone: He is suddenly back in bunker mode, taunted not only by Republicans but Democrats as well to visit the border, too afraid to be photographed amid the horror. Even worse, the president was shamed into meeting with Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) to be educated on the matter in his travels to the Lone Star State for some inconveniently scheduled fundraisers. Read more ..
|Michael Ledeen||July 9th 2014|
Everything is coming up thorns for the Obama administration in the Middle East these days, and several of its policies seem to change daily. Take its stand on Syria's tyrant, Bashar Assad. One day Obama says "Assad must go," the next his aides whisper that it might be good for Assad to stay for a while longer. This is only one of many policies that have changed with equal speed, such as shifting from opposition to the Egyptian military government to support for, and cooperation with, General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. And President Obama has crossed so many of his own red lines on Syria and Iraq that it's hard to keep track of his actual geopolitical position. Read more ..
Operation Protective Edge
|David Harris||July 8th 2014|
Try as I might, there are some things I just don’t get.
For starters, I’m seeking to understand Israel’s options in today’s Middle East.
To listen to some observers in the media and in foreign ministries, it’s all quite simple and yet puzzling: simple because the answer is obvious, and puzzling because somehow Israel is the only country that doesn’t get it.
These observers insist that while the Palestinians want peace and the region supports it, Israel, for reasons best known only to itself, opposes a deal, preferring the status quo to the dawning of a new era. Read more ..
|Juan Williams||July 7th 2014|
A year ago, top Democratic political strategists pointed to one big political stick their candidates could use to beat back a possible Republican landslide in the 2014 midterm elections.
The issue: Rising income inequality. Now the strategy is coming to life with help from Republicans in Congress.
With the GOP majority in the House blocking an extension of long-term unemployment insurance, a group of House Democrats, led by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), circulated a letter last week asking for a meeting to discuss the topic – not with Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) but with the incoming House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).
Press reports described this as an “end-run” around Boehner who, along with the outgoing Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), had refused to take up the issue for a vote in the House. The Democrats, smelling a ripe campaign issue, are quick to point out that if Congress does not act before the end of the year, more than 5 million Americans will lose their unemployment benefits and be left out in the cold. Democrats are also being handed ammunition on income inequality by the Republican refusal to renew the Highway Trust Fund. Read more ..
Obama' Second Term
|Michael Barone||July 6th 2014|
Seldom in American history has the Supreme Court unanimously rejected positions advocated by presidents' administrations. But in this respect at least, President Obama has produced the fundamental transformation he promised in his 2008 campaign. Over the last three years, the Court has rejected Obama administration positions repeatedly in unanimous 9-0 decisions.
A review of these cases reveals much about the governing philosophy of the Obama administration. One thing is abundantly clear, namely that this administration has a crabbed view of the First Amendment right of free exercise of religion. That is apparent not only in June's 5-4 decision ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby that the Obamacare contraception mandate is trumped by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
It's even clearer in the 2012 Hosanna-Tabor Church v. EEOC case, in which the Court unanimously said that churches have the right to select their own clergy. The administration's position, that government could decide who counts as clergy, was described as “amazing” by Justice (and former Obama solicitor general) Elena Kagan. Read more ..
America on Edge
For all the gravity with which the presidency is written about, assessments of presidents are often at least partly based on fluff more suitable for Hollywood than Washington. Among the criteria that presidential rankings use are leadership, accomplishments, political skill, and character. Every one of those criteria but accomplishments are extremely vague to the point where no two people could agree on a definition. All of these qualities except character are pointedly amoral. Technically, Foreign Minister Von Ribbentrop of the Third Reich was quite adept at political skill. For such amoral use of skill, he was rightly hanged at Nuremberg.
Other criteria used over the years include handling of the economy, communication, ability to compromise, foreign policy accomplishments, intelligence, imagination, family, education, and experience. For all except the economy and foreign policy, these are qualities more suited to middle management at a corporation than president. One looks in vain for heroic qualities, or even moral ones or basic decency. Read more ..
The Way We Are
|Gary Schmitt||July 5th 2014|
July 4th is celebrated as Independence Day—the day the 13 colonies formally declared their independence from Great Britain. In truth, that decision was made on July 2nd, 1776, in a vote by the Continental Congress. July 4th is the day the Congress issued the Declaration of Independence—a document justifying that break with an eye toward “a decent respect to the opinions of mankind.” In that respect, the Declaration was as much a foreign policy document as a simple statement of the governing principles by which both our break from London and our future government was to be judged. A government’s failure to take account of the fact that “all men are created equal” and a failure to secure men’s individual rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” means that a people, any people, has justifiable grounds for “abolishing” its ties, its allegiance, to that government. Read more ..
Middle East on Edge
|Michael Doran||July 3rd 2014|
With the June 10 capture of the city of Mosul by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), a debate promptly reopened in the American media over America’s role in the fate of post-Saddam Hussein Iraq. Typifying one side of the debate was former President Bill Clinton, who on network television laid the blame for today’s problems squarely on the shoulders of the Bush administration. “If they hadn’t gone to war in Iraq,” he said, “none of this would be happening.” On the other side, there are suggestions that President Obama’s neglect of Iraq has been at least as harmful as was the interventionism of his predecessor, if not more so.
But the Iraq war as we once knew it is no longer, and the debate over it leaves us mired unprofitably in the past. The rise of ISIS is a subset of a new conflict, one that stretches all the way from Baghdad to Beirut. That conflict has its own unique character. What is it about? Who are its primary participants? Where do America’s vital interests lie, and what should America’s strategy be? Read more ..
|Charles Murray||July 1st 2014|
Social conservatives. Libertarians. Country-club conservatives. Tea party conservatives. Everybody in politics knows that those sets of people who usually vote Republican cannot be arrayed in a continuum from moderately conservative to extremely conservative. They are on different political planes. They usually have just enough in common to vote for the same candidate.
Why then do we still talk about the left in terms of a continuum from moderately liberal to extremely liberal? Divisions have been occurring on the left that mirror the divisions on the right. Different segments of the left are now on different planes.
A few weeks ago, I was thrown into a situation where I shared drinks and dinner with two men who have held high positions in Democratic administrations. Both men are lifelong liberals. There's nothing "moderate" about their liberalism. But as the pleasant evening wore on (we knew that there was no point in trying to change anyone's opinion on anything), I was struck by how little their politics have to do with other elements of the left. Read more ..
The 2014 Vote
|Nathan Evans||June 30th 2014|
Last Tuesday night, longstanding Republican Sen. Thad Cochran defied the polls and defeated Tea Party challenger Chris McDaniel in the Mississippi Senate primary runoff by a 51 to 49 percent margin. While the Republican establishment in D.C. rejoiced at their colleague’s victory, this election also could confirm their worst nightmare: field programs can effectively turn out voters in mass.
After losing the initial primary election on June 3rd, Cochran knew he had to shake things up. The traditional strategy of pummeling the airwaves with negative advertisement did not seem to be working, and his opponent was up in almost every single poll. Read more ..
The 2016 Campaign
|Brent Budowsky||June 29th 2014|
I am a progressive populist who strongly supports Hillary Clinton for president. But I must admit, the most memorable aspect of Clinton’s carefully orchestrated book tour for Hard Choices could be the discussion about whether she is fully in tune with the temper of our times on matters of wealth and opportunity in America.
There is a growing concern in Democratic circles, which I share, about whether the Hillary Clinton who could run in 2016 is repeating the mistake she made in 2008, when she ran as the inevitable and invincible candidate of a political establishment held in widespread public disrepute. Read more ..
The Battle for Iraq
|A.B. Stoddard||June 28th 2014|
Wanted: Republicans willing to step up and explain just how we are going to face down the threat of new terrorist groups and non-state actors trying to take over sovereign countries in the Middle East, now or when President Obama has left office.
In a wrenching debate over the deterioration in Iraq and the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), not surprisingly, has called for airstrikes. But he isn’t running for president again. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) agreed with Obama’s decision not to send ground forces, only to be called “isolationist” by former Vice President Dick Cheney.
Even amid some regret among conservatives, there isn’t much leadership to be found for a crisis we will be managing for years to come. After insurgents began to claim large swaths of territory in Iraq last week, conservative fire-breather and radio talk show host Glenn Beck declared that liberals had been right all along on our role in Iraq. They may or may not have been, but such a reversal was stunning. Read more ..
|Jonah Goldberg||June 27th 2014|
Paging Elizabeth Warren: This is your moment.
In 2007, Democrats were delirious with rage about the Iraq war. Hillary Clinton, the “inevitable” presidential front-runner, had voted for the war and refused to apologize for it. Other leading candidates, including Joe Biden, John Edwards, and Chris Dodd, voted for it too. This left a huge opening for a credible antiwar candidate. Barack Obama, inexperienced and underqualified, nonetheless jumped into the vacuum. The rest, as they say, is history.
Today, the issue that obsesses the base of the Democratic party is income inequality. I think that’s foolish. The underlying causes of inequality — miserable economic growth, stagnating wages, poverty, etc. — are vastly more worthy challenges. Though, in fairness, many people actually have those problems in mind when they talk about inequality.
There’s another component to the inequality obsession: populism. People increasingly feel that economic and political elites are enriching themselves, not by making great products or selling valuable services, but by cutting backroom deals and selling influence. This rage is remarkably bipartisan. It is the one theme that loosely unites tea partiers and Wall Street occupiers alike. Read more ..
Russia on Edge
|Walter G. Moss||June 27th 2014|
In previous essays I have been critical of Russian and U.S. policies toward each other. The last of these essays, motivated by the current Ukrainian crisis, stated that our post-1991 policy toward Russia has been “stale, unimaginative, and wrong-headed.” Below are suggestions for a new U. S. approach—what Russia should do is another matter.
On this 100-year anniversary of the start of World War I, my approach aims at peace, seeking to avoid the horrors of war, which some U.S. citizens are too blasé about since we have not had a war on U.S. soil since the Civil War. It is also one of “ethical realism,” as Anatol Lieven and John Hulsman defined the term in their 2006 book on foreign policy. And it is heavily indebted to critics mentioned in previous essays (from the left and the right) of our post-communist Russia policy. Read more ..
The Way We Are
|Jeffrey Kaplan ||June 26th 2014|
Forty years ago Americans were stunned by images of North Vietnamese tanks rolling into the heart of Saigon. The Vietnam War had bitterly divided the nation and cost 58,220 American lives. Responding to American public opinion, then President Gerald R. Ford declined to intervene—a tacit admission of defeat.
Today, Americans are stunned by images of another anti-American force, this one on the move toward Baghdad, only recently vacated by American troops. The war in Iraq has bitterly divided the nation. At this writing, the American-trained Iraqi army has collapsed, and pleas for American help are falling on deaf ears.
Déjà vu all over again? Read more ..
|Michael Barone||June 25th 2014|
The Census Bureau is considering a change for the 2020 Census: Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin would be one of the responses offered under a single race question. This is a profoundly bad idea, as Amitai Etzioni explains in a recent opinion article in the Wall Street Journal.
The change is apparently prompted by the fact that 2 million people who claimed Hispanic status in the last two censuses changed their race classification from some other race in 2000 to white in 2010. The aim, it seems, is to maximize the number of people classified as non-white and therefore entitled to some form of racial preference. It's understandable that Hispanics should give inconsistent responses, since the Latin American societies from which they (or their immigrant ancestors) come have different racial mixes and different radical categories than those in the United States. They do not fit easily into U.S. racial categories. Read more ..
The Battle for Iraq
|Gal Luft and Robert Mcfarlane||June 24th 2014|
Wall Street Journal
The Iraqi oil patch has been a coveted prize for most of the past century. The same concerns over oil supplies expressed in the wake of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria's capture of key Iraqi cities were around during World War I. But Iraq's oil is even more needed now than it was 100 years ago, and while the turmoil there is having only a modest impact on today's oil market, it could sow the seeds for painful oil shocks in the future.
On the eve of the 2003 Iraq war, oil experts held that Iraqi production could quickly be restored to the pre-1990 level of about three million barrels a day and ramped up to as much as six million barrels a day by 2010 and seven to eight million by 2020. Things didn't turn out that way. Political instability, corruption and the lack of an adequate regulatory framework turned away multinational oil companies. Foreign investment in the oil and gas sector came at a trickle. Iraq's production was so uncertain that even OPEC exempted the country from its quota system. Read more ..
The Battle for Iraq
|Michael Eisenstadt||June 22nd 2014|
The breathtaking capture of large swathes of northern Iraq in the last week by a relatively small, and lightly armed force of Sunni Arab militants fighting under the banner of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant, also known as ISIL or ISIS, has altered the strategic landscape of the Middle East.
The successor to al-Qaida in Iraq, ISIL has ridden a wave of resentment felt by Iraq’s Sunni Arabs at the exclusionary sectarian policies pursued by Iraq’s Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
Its rise has been greatly facilitated by Syria’s civil war, which enabled ISIL to establish a base of operations in eastern Syria and to transform itself into a lightly armed, mobile force with thousands of experienced fighters (including many freed prisoners and foreign volunteers). Over a year ago, ISIL began shifting resources back to Iraq, operating openly in the western part of the country, initiating a suicide bombing campaign, and early this year seizing control of several towns in Anbar province, including Fallujah. Read more ..
|Michael Barone||June 22nd 2014|
America’s two political parties seem to be coming apart.
That's in contrast to the relatively stable competition of the last 20 years, when Democrats have won four of six presidential elections and Republicans won House majorities in eight of ten congressional contests, always by less than landslide margins. The parties' stands on issues have remained familiar from one cycle to the next.
That pattern seems likely to hold this year, with Republicans favored to hold their House majority and with a better than 50 percent chance of gaining the Senate majority that eluded them in 2010 and 2012. But the outlook for 2016 is murky, with a stale Hillary Clinton way ahead of other Democrats and a stable of Republicans closely clustered out of the starting gate with no clear leader or perceptible opening. Read more ..
The Battle for Iraq
|Shoshana Bryen||June 20th 2014|
The rapid (although not unpredicted) entry of radical Sunni jihadists into Mosul, Tikrit and other largely Sunni areas of Iraq, and their movement toward Baghdad, has prompted cries from left, right and center about the failure of U.S. policies in the region. And failure it is, although not of the "Bush should never have gone there," or "Obama should never have withdrawn from there," or – perhaps most oddly, "If Obama had only armed the 'moderate, secular opposition' in Syria, this never would have happened" sort.
It is a failure to look back, look forward and look around. It is a failure to ask the truly existential questions, "What can the United States tolerate in the world – what MUST we tolerate because we are not prepared to stop it?" and the corollary, "What can the United States simply not afford – not now, not later, not ever – and how are we going to keep truly intolerable things from happening?" Read more ..
Obama's Second Term
|Mark J. Rozell and Mitchel A. Sollenberger||June 19th 2014|
Although President Barack Obama pledged to conduct the "most transparent administration in history", there is not much difference between his and his recent predecessors' administrations regarding protecting executive branch secrecy. The latest ploy by Justice Department attorneys is to shield all agency documents from a congressional committee investigating allegations of wrongdoing in the Fast and Furious scandal.
It is no exaggeration to say that the latest legal argument by the Justice Department is Nixonian in scope.
Former President Richard Nixon had argued that executive privilege – the recognized presidential power to withhold information under certain circumstances – extended to the entire executive branch of the federal government. The former president reasoned that all officials of the executive branch are "an extension of the president" himself, and thus covered by the privilege. If true, entities with recognized compulsory power – Congress, the courts, independent counsels and special prosecutors – would never be able to access any executive branch documents any time the president uttered the words "executive privilege." Back then, legal scholars widely denounced, even mocked, the president's assertion of such an expansive executive power. Read more ..
The Battle for Syria
|Elie Khawand||June 18th 2014|
The major error was committed during the Iraqi war by allowing the Syrian Regime to remain in power. While extracting Saddam was a necessity for the Region's stability keeping Assad in power was a grave mistake.
Without the Syrian regime, the war in Iraq would have been swiftly concluded and the Iraqis could have easily brought a new fair system of government to Iraq. Without the Syrian regime, our soldiers in Iraq would not have been killed and injured by jihadist bombs and suicide bombers exported from Syria. Without the Syrian regime Iran would not have been able to interfere in Iraq, Lebanon, Gaza,… and would not have been able to have a sectarian militia armed to the teeth in Lebanon, Hezbollah, ready to execute orders from the Iranian supreme leader. Read more ..
The Battle for Iraq
Mosul, Tikrit, Fallujah. Their names sound so familiar, because it was only a few years ago that American soldiers won those cities back from the control of Islamic extremists.
Sadly, those same cities are back in the news today, as Islamic extremists, under the banner of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, take them back from an almost nonexistent Iraqi army. Samarra’s their next target. Then, it’s only a matter of days before they move on to Baghdad. Once Baghdad falls, Iraq is gone.
In a panic, finally realizing he’s got a serious problem, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is begging the United States for military assistance to turn back the insurgents. Fortunately, President Obama has flatly dismissed sending American troops back into Iraq. Unfortunately, he’s seriously considering a range of other options, including airstrikes, which would also be a big mistake. We should not let ourselves be sucked into Iraq: The sequel. Read more ..
Obama's Second Term
|Daniel Byman||June 16th 2014|
In the fight against jihadist insurgents across the planet, the United States can offer its partners a lot of help: arms and intelligence, training for local security forces, economic aid, and in extreme cases, air strikes to take out the bad guys.
It is the allies, of course, that get to do the actual fighting and dying.
After more than a decade of conflicts in which American ground forces served in harm’s way, the United States is moving to a more hands-off approach in its fight against insurgents with ideological or operational ties to al-Qaeda. In Afghanistan, President Obama has announced a major drawdown of troops, and in Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen, the United States intervenes mainly via drones or small numbers of troops training local forces. Read more ..
After the Arab Spring
|Jonah Goldberg||June 14th 2014|
The Arab Spring is over. Welcome to the Jihadi Spring.
Across a huge swath of what, up until recently, had been known as Iraq and Syria, a transnational movement of Sunni Islamic extremists has taken control. The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has conquered — without much effort — Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city, along with most of the province of Nineveh. It’s also taken Tikrit, Saddam Hussein’s hometown. Along the way it has ransacked banks (to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars), pillaged weapon stockpiles (including the stuff we left behind for the Iraqi army), and recruited ever more fighters from Iraq, Syria, and abroad.
ISIS started out as an al-Qaeda franchise, but in 2011 it broke off to become an independent dealer of Islamist mayhem. If anything, it is more extreme than al-Qaeda — though that fine distinction probably means little to the Shiites and Christians it slaughters. Read more ..
The Battle for Iraq
|Teresa Studzinski and Dr. David Leffler||June 13th 2014|
NBC News reports that U.S. President Barack Obama said "I don't rule out anything," and "my national security team is looking at all the options" with regard to the rapidly growing unrest in Iraq. "This is an area that we have been watching with a lot of concern," he said.
Even if The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, is defeated, the problem of terrorism will not likely be solved for long, particularly if the Iraq's economy does not improve. It would be just a matter of time before other terrorists move in to take their place. History shows that past defense plans regarding Iraq have failed. These plans were based largely on conjecture, and now we have seen their outcome. The conventional military approach of fighting terrorism lacks a statistical guarantee of success of where a leader like Obama can wisely and safely assert "yes, this approach will definitely work." Read more ..
Iraq on Edge
|Barbara Slavin||June 12th 2014|
Saddam Hussein must be laughing in his grave.
President George W. Bush celebrated Saddam’s overthrow in 2003 as the liberation of Iraqis from decades of dictatorial rule and costly warfare against Iraq’s neighbors.
But the democratically elected government that followed has failed to stabilize the country and opened the door to the expansion of a safe haven for Islamist militants so extreme that even al-Qaeda has rejected them.
This week, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), captured Iraq’s second largest city, Mosul, unfurling the black flag of jihad over the corpses of Iraqi security forces and sending half a million residents fleeing in terror. Read more ..
Washington on Edge
The shockwaves shook Washington beginning late Tuesday and throughout the day on Wednesday.
House Majority leader Eric Cantor, the second most powerful lawmaker in the House of Representatives, lost a primary challenge to David Brat, an underfunded challenger with grassroots back from Tea Party activists.
The defeat of a high-ranking member of Congress is rare, especially in a party primary election. The fact that it was completely unexpected has put a lot of Republicans on high alert, unwilling to do anything that might spark an angry reaction from conservative activists back home.
So what’s the big deal about the Cantor defeat? Plenty.
For starters, immigration reform may be a dead issue in this session of Congress.
Don’t like the current state of U.S. partisan politics? Too bad, because there’s more to come and it’s probably only going to get to worse.
Fascinated by the ongoing battle between mainstream Republicans and the Tea Party? Good, because there is plenty more to come, not just this election year but in the 2016 presidential year as well.
Immigration reform setback
The most immediate victim in the wake of Eric Cantor’s defeat may be the push for immigration reform in the House. House Republican leaders had talked about doing small bits of immigration legislation as a counter to a more sweeping bill that was passed by the Senate. But Cantor was criticized for his support for a version of the so-called Dream Act, which sets up a path to citizenship for immigrant children who were brought to the country illegally. Cantor fought back against those who saw him as too liberal on immigration reform, but it was too late. Read more ..
Israel and the Vatican
|Paddy Monaghan||June 11th 2014|
I strongly disagree with Caroline Glick’s conclusion in her May 27 article that Pope Francis “is leading the Catholic Church in a distressingly anti-Jewish direction.” I can understand Caroline’s distress at some of the pope’s actions and words but it is important to have balance and not draw wrong conclusions.
Pope Francis is totally committed to reconciliation between the Church and Israel. I would like to demonstrate this under five headings:
1. State of Israel:
Pope Francis in his first Encyclical in November 2013 affirmed God’s everlasting covenant with the Jews: “We hold the Jewish people in special regard because their covenant with God has never been revoked, for ‘the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable’ (Rom 11:29).”
It is noteworthy that Pope Francis reappointed Father Raniero Cantalamessa as preacher to the papal household. Read more ..
Obama's Second Term
|Ramesh Ponnuru||June 10th 2014|
Republicans are calling President Barack Obama's new coal-plant regulations a "power grab." The truth is more complicated, and ominous, than that.
This isn't a case where the executive branch has simply gone beyond its authority. It's a case where officials in all three branches of government have found a way to achieve their policy goals while shielding themselves from accountability.
Congress sends bills to the president and the president signs them: That's how major policy changes are supposed to work. But Congress has never passed large-scale regulations to combat global warming. It has never even voted to authorize such regulations.
In 2007, though, the Supreme Court pretended that Congress had done so. Lawmakers had voted to fight climate change without realizing it, when they enacted the Clean Air Act. So ruled the four liberal justices on the bench at the time, plus Justice Anthony Kennedy. Read more ..
See Earlier Stories 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48