Edge on Energy
|Rebekah Hebbert||October 26th 2010|
Oil sands: satanic horror, or priceless jewel? To describe the extremes of the debate over Canada’s large bitumen deposits thus is barely to exaggerate the positions taken up by opponents and supporters of exploitation of this rising source of crude oil.
For environmentalists, oil sands, or as they are technically known, bituminous sands, are the epitome of everything they hate: big business, oil, greenhouse gas emissions, oil, water wasted and polluted, oil, governmental indifference or collusion, oil, threatened animals and trees -- oh yes, and oil as well. Read more ..
|Armstrong Williams||October 18th 2010|
Cutting Edge Commentator
There’s an interesting storyline playing out in the corridors of the Capitol this week. Yes, Congress is in its fall recess, members having returned home for the last stretch of campaigning before that first Tuesday in November. But all is not so quiet on the Eastern Front; the Washington punditocracy is still flourishing, reading the tea leaves to discover the fate of every House and Senate incumbent.
What ultimately happens on Election Day will certainly impact the makeup of House and Senate leadership on both sides of the aisle. Many are speculating just how House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) will govern in a new era with far fewer Democrats and, most likely, a lost majority.
Last week, some Hill papers openly wondered what type of vengeance a scorned Pelosi would exact on those who dared to question her decisions and legislative strategies that put the rank-and-file in such dire straits.
Such predictions on Pelosi’s future behavior and how she’ll handle those unfaithful members are misguided and a waste of time. No matter what happens on Election Day—less than a month from today—Nancy Pelosi will not be Speaker of the House in 2011 and may not be leading Democrats in Congress at all. Read more ..
Energy and Power
|Michael Parenti||October 18th 2010|
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) is a multi-billion-dollar privately owned, publicly regulated utility whose main function is to make enormous profits for its shareholders at great cost to ratepayers. I know this to be true; I’m one of the ratepayers.
The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) permits PG&E to charge rates that are 30 percent higher than the national average. PG&E’s shareholders enjoy a guaranteed 11.35 percent yearly return on equity. That’s slightly higher than the 11 percent that swindler Bernard Madoff pretended to offer his investment victims. After Madoff was exposed, his victims were chided for not having realized that no one pulls down an 11 percent return year after year on the stock market. But PG&E investors take in more than that every year. And unlike Madoff, the company’s earnings are for real, guaranteed at a fixed rate of return, devoid of risk. Read more ..
Brazil on the Edge
|Nicky Pear||October 11th 2010|
Council on Hemispheric Affairs
|Dilma Youseff and President Lula da Silva|
The October 3 election result in Brazil did not transpire in the way that polls had predicted. Until a week ago, it was widely assumed that Dilma Rousseff of the Worker’s Party (PT) was a shoo-in for victory in the first round of voting, following the endorsement of the widely popular incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. However, as results emerged it became clear that Rousseff had failed to reach the 50 percent of votes needed to take the presidency without a runoff. In the end, Rousseff won 47.6 percent of the vote, while José Serra, a veteran of the Social Democrat Party (PSDB) took second place with 32.6 percent, reflecting a setback for the Lula machine. Read more ..
Edge on Asia
|Kensy Joseph||October 11th 2010|
The 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi, which began on October 3, have become the focus of international interest due to concerns over the safety and standard of the facilities and accommodation. About a year ago, the Chairman of the Commonwealth Games Organising Committee, Suresh Kalmadi, informed the world that the 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi would be "memorable." With only a few days to go before the inauguration, it already is – but for all the wrong reasons.
The litany of woes afflicting the preparations for the Games– corruption, nepotism, inefficiency, serious budget overrun, corner-cutting, a shoddy end-product, terrorist attacks and exploitation of labour (including children) – could be lifted straight from an obscure John Le Carré banana republic. Read more ..
The Economic Crisis on Edge
|Alejo José G. Sison||October 4th 2010|
European Business Ethics Network
It would be foolish for me to pick an argument with Paul Krugman on economics. A Nobel Prize winner, he is one of the foremost economists in the world. But the statement in his latest New York Times column that “Economics is not a morality play” is not so much about economics as it is about ethics, and here is where I wish to engage him.
What exactly does he mean? Essentially, he wishes to disabuse us of the belief that economics is a “happy story in which virtue is rewarded and vice punished”. That much we must concede, together with most people who have ever given serious thought to ethics. In fact, ethics, as a philosophical discipline, began in ancient Greece as a reflection on the all too common experience of the triumph of evil over good. Read more ..
Midterm Electionbs on the Edge
|Armstrong Williams||September 27th 2010|
Cutting Edge Commentator
Like many, I like to spend my summer months catching up on some good books and vacationing in Europe. Only this year, I’ve stopped reading fiction. Why bother when real life is so much more interesting? In fact, I think I’ll stop reading books altogether for the next several weeks. All I need are the latest editions of The Hill and the Washington Times to cover the scintillating scandals that have totally rocked Democratic Reps. Charles Rangel (NY) and Maxine Waters (CA). I know fiction writers are green with envy on these developing storylines.
The latest developments surrounding the Waters and Rangel cases have both looking like they will spend 2011 in retirement; perhaps even in the pokey if there’s another shoe that has yet to fall.
Both claim their innocence, with Rep. Rangel defiantly telling supporters and whoever will listen earlier this year at his annual mega-birthday bash that he will fight these allegations with every fiber of his being.
Has anyone seen this summer movie before? I have. Try 2006 when Republicans such as former Reps. Rick Renzi, Richard Pombo, Mark Foley, and others lined up to the microphones to declare their innocence. Instead of summarily removing them from office (or at least asking them to step down from running that year), Republican leaders whistled in the other direction, refusing to set an example. [I don’t remember; did Republican leadership not call for any of their resignations? Seems to me they might have belatedly called for Foley’s, but like I said, I’m not sure. Boehner publically asked Renzi to step down. Pombo and Foley were not publically asked.] Read more ..
America on Edge
|Mariana Barillas||September 27th 2010|
Just two months ago, Antoine Dodson was just scraping by and trying to support his family. Today he is an international Internet celebrity.
It all started when a Huntsville, Alabama, news crew taped an interview of the visibly upset Antoine about the attempted rape of his sister by an assailant in July. Antoine defended his sister, struggling with the assailant who then fled. Within hours, the video of the news was posted on YouTube. Millions have watched the original video while millions more have watched the auto-tuned remix. The song has taken on a life of its own and even cracked the Billboard Top 100 chart.
Profits from the YouTube videos, iTunes sales of the song, merchandise, and donations have been enough for Antoine, who supports his five brothers and sisters, to move himself and his family out of the “projects” and into a new house.
While the Dodson family has greatly benefited from the video, one has to ask why the Dodson video has become so popular. Read more ..
|Andrew Bostom||September 20th 2010|
Cutting Edge commentator
The Arab and non-Arab Muslim umma, or global community, vehemently denies pre-Islamic Jewish and ignores pre-Islamic Christian connections to all the territories that comprised historical Syro-Palestine—including Judea, Samaria, modern Israel within the 1949 armistice borders, and Gaza. This historical negationism is melded to Islam’s own theological supresessionism which abrogates Judaism and Christianity as deliberately corrupted, crude manifestations of the one true primordial monotheism, Islam. (See Koran 3:67—“No; Abraham in truth was not a Jew, neither a Christian; but he was a Muslim and one pure of faith [i.e., Islam]; certainly he was never of the idolaters.”) Such an eternal religio-political worldview should raise grave doubts about the prospects of negotiating a permanent peace settlement between the Israelis and the local Arab Muslim representatives of the global Islamic umma, the Palestinian Arabs. Read more ..
The Edge of Safety
|Armstrong Williams||September 20th 2010|
Cutting Edge Commentator
I’m sorry, but the killing of James Lee, the Discovery Channel gunman who took several employees hostage, was the only option for that sick individual. Over time we have seen many James Lees and the lives they’ve destroyed in pursuit of their twisted outlook on life. In past hostage situations, imagine that the police had responded in a similar manner; how many innocent people and bystanders would be alive today? While we believe there is a time and place for negotiating with mental head cases that take people hostage, still we can never know the magnitude of loss of lives with that tactic until the smoke clears.
Special thanks go out to the Montgomery County officers and SWAT members who thought it better to shoot first and later ask questions about what kind of device Lee had strapped to his person during those intense hours. Often Law Enforcement officials are blamed and second-guessed when people in these situations lose their lives for no reason. We also know that even in the James Lee matter, their quick decision to shoot could have had severe consequences. In the final analysis though, their quick thinking and judgment from past experiences may have saved hundreds of people from injury, death, or destruction. Going forward, when we as countrymen are faced with hostile situations of this magnitude, it would be wise to subdue or eliminate the perpetrator if possible. This principle should apply in cases where it was later learned that their threats and actions would not have led to innocent people dying. Read more ..
The Obama Edge
|Armstrong Williams||September 13th 2010|
Cutting Edge Commentator
“Mission accomplished.” Two words. A phrase that haunted one president is now the calling card of success for another. While President Obama technically claimed no victory in his national Oval Office address last week, the subtext was clear: in this election charged season, your president has delivered on a campaign promise.
For the better part of this decade, Americans have struggled with their own identity crisis on this war. It was always easy to be “for the troops.” Yet many succumbed to the frustrations we all felt just before the Surge started to push back against rogue militants (sentiments we see emerging again today as we surge forces into Afghanistan). They collectively threw their hands up in disgust. Seeing no end in sight, doubters blamed President George Bush and his cowboy attitude toward Saddam and his country.
Barack Obama was all too eager to oblige that sentiment, stoke those frustrations, and ride the utter regret to the White House. But what President Obama saw upon assuming office was not the easy solution Candidate Obama projected while on the campaign trail.
Fast forward two years, and three months late on some date plucked out of thin air; we now have a commander-in-chief ready to move on, whether or not Iraq is. Read more ..
Edge on Petro-Politics
|Gal Luft||September 13th 2010|
Cutting Edge Energy and Security Writer
Fifty years ago this week, five of the world’s top oil-producing countries convened in Baghdad to form the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The goal of the cartel was to “assert its member countries’ legitimate rights” and gain “a major say in the pricing of crude oil on world markets.” OPEC did just that. In the decades that followed, its members nationalized international companies’ oil fields and infrastructure assets, instated a quota system, and gained the upper hand in price negotiations. Within a decade, they had become the most powerful cartel in modern history. Read more ..
|Rachel Ehrenfeld||September 13th 2010|
American Center for Democracy
Former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, is no stranger to the Islamic agenda. As the Quartet's special envoy to the Middle East, his recent statement, "If these people could have killed 30,000 or 300,000 [on 9/11], they would have," should serve as a wakeup call. While Blair recognizes that "Islam's roots are deep, its tentacles are long,” he failed to mention the role that Britain's libel laws play in helping radical Muslims to shield their activities.
Soon after the attacks on the U.S. on 9/11, wealthy financiers of al Qaeda, especially from Saudi Arabia, began using Britain’s plaintiff-friendly libel laws and judges to muzzle the media from exposing national security threats, especially the names of al Qaeda’s financiers. Their lawfare have made London the Mecca of libel tourism, and England’s libel bar rich.
Their tactics were so effective that mere threat of suit is often enough to compel a pre-trial confidential settlement especially by American beleaguered researchers, investigators, journalists, publishers, bloggers and others, who deprived of their Constitutional free speech rights, wish to avoid steep legal costs and unjustified reputational ruin.
Libel tourism in the U.K. chilled the media’s commitment to shed light on matters of national security, depriving the public of important information and preventing critical debate. It causes investigative journalists and authors to stay away from reporting on terror financiers, and publishers to shun controversial subjects and authors. Read more ..
|Brenden Riley||September 13th 2010|
Council on Hemispheric Affairs
In July 2010, a Los Angeles judge overturned a previous ruling that had awarded $2.3 million in compensation to six Nicaraguan banana workers. Dole Food Company, the workers’ former employer, had authorized the administration of dangerous pesticides that left the men sterile. The U.S. court ruled that the plaintiffs’ lawyers had knowingly manipulated the case, Tellez v. Dole Food Co., through the use of fraud, allegedly recruiting fake employees to testify that they had been exposed to pesticides that had caused them severe health problemswhile employed by the food giant. However, the testimonies that pointed to the scam came from witnesses whose identities were not disclosed, ostensibly in order to protect them from hostilities in Nicaragua.
As a result, none of the statements can be checked for accuracy, nor could one readily determine the credibility of these anonymous witnesses. One such witness later recanted his testimony, asserting that Dole had flown him to Costa Rica and bribed him to say that the plaintiffs had never worked on the plantations. The payment for his testimony amounted in the end to some three hundred dollars, a sad illustration of the desperation that pervades the lowest classes of the second-poorest nation in the hemisphere. Read more ..
The Obama Edge
|Robert W. Merry||September 6th 2010|
U.S. President Barack Obama’s August 31 Oval Office speech on the end of U.S. combat operations in Iraq had many purposes: to claim a measure of credit for largely fulfilling one of his major campaign promises; to thank those who have served and sacrificed in the cause; to spread the balm of unity over any lingering domestic wounds; to assure Americans that it has all been worth it and that no dishonor was attached to this foreign adventure, which was opposed by many in Obama’s own party and by him from the beginning.
Of all those purposes, and any others that might have been conceived, the need to express assurance of the war’s validity — and honor in its outcome — is by far the most important. Any national leader must protect and nurture the legend of any war over which he presides, even those — actually, particularly those — he has brought to a close. The people need to feel that the sacrifice in blood and treasure was worth it, that the mission’s rationale still makes sense, that the nation’s standing and prestige remain intact.
In terms of America, nothing illustrates this more starkly than the Vietnam experience. This was a war that emerged quite naturally out of a foreign policy outlook, “containment,” that had shaped American behavior in the world for nearly two decades and would continue to shape it for another two decades. Hence, one could argue that the Vietnam War was a noble effort entirely consistent with a policy that eventually proved brilliantly successful. Read more ..
|Armstrong Williams||August 30th 2010|
Cutting Edge News Commentator
Islam emerged from what is modern day Saudi Arabia in the 7th century, and never looked back. Muslim armies swept across North Africa and invaded Catholic Spain, destroying or converting the Christian communities along the way. They turned churches into mosques, and made Islam the official religion. Muslim armies also took over the Holy Land, destroyed the last non-Islamic Persian empire, and moved into Asia Minor (modern day Turkey). By the 16th century, Islam had destroyed the Christian Byzantine Empire, had taken over Constantinople, and had turned the Hagia Sophia -- the most beautiful church in Christendom -- into a mosque. A century later, Muslim armies were outside the gates of Vienna. Read more ..
Crimes Against Children
|Michael Parenti||August 30th 2010|
When Pope John Paul II was still living in Poland as Cardinal Karol Wojtyła, he claimed that the security police would accuse priests of sexual abuse just to hassle and discredit them. (New York Times, Mar 28, 2010). For Wojtyła, the Polish pedophilia problem was nothing more than a Communist plot to smear the church.
By the early 1980s, Wojtyła, now ensconced in Rome as Pope John Paul II, treated all stories about pedophile clergy with dismissive aplomb, as little more than slander directed against the church. That remained his stance for the next twenty years.
Today, in post-communist Poland, clerical abuse cases have been surfacing slowly—very slowly. Writing in the leading daily Gazeta Wyborcza, a middle-aged man reported having been sexually abused as a child by a priest. He acknowledged however that Poland was not prepared to deal with such transgressions. “It’s still too early … Can you imagine what life would look like if an inhabitant of a small town or village decided to talk? I can already see the committees of defense for the accused priests.” Read more ..
Ground Zero Mosque
|Shmuley Boteach||August 23rd 2010|
|Rabbi Shmuley Boteach|
I still remember, Russell, when you came to my debate with Rev. Al Sharpton, nine years ago, in New York City. You struck me then as a man of warmth and openness. In that spirit I offer you this response to your recent blog postings in the Huffington Post supporting the Ground Zero mosque
and your categorization of those opposing it as being guilty of hatred and bigotry, which strikes me as a bit harsh.
For the record, I am a supporter of the mosque being built, but only under two conditions. First, that its builders consult the families of the Ground Zero dead, who are the people whose opinion matters most. Second, that the 13-story complex include a museum detailing the events of 9/11 with exhibits explaining the modern abuse of Islamic teachings by extremists and their repudiation by Islam itself.
I don’t expect you to agree with my conditions, or with those who oppose the mosque outright. But I do ask that you consider this. Read more ..
Mendoza Against the Deaf
|Megan Malzkuhn||August 23rd 2010|
Special interest groups with a lack of ethics are currently making their way through the Capitol in Sacramento to lobby for the bill AB 2072. On one hand, in the legal prose, AB 2072 is about parents’ choices for their Deaf newborns. On the other hand, analyzing the jargon, it is about corporations’ eagerness to privatize human beings.
The Deaf and bilingual community have done everything by the book to save the future of Deaf newborns. They went to Sacramento to lobby politicians to oppose AB 2072. They showed up at the hearings and floor votes. They made video testimonials. They wrote articles. They called their Assemblymen and Senators to oppose the bill. They tried to meet with Assemblyman Tony Mendoza, the author of AB 2072, several times even though Mendoza repeatedly ignored them. They exhausted their options. They are educators of the Deaf, parents of Deaf children, siblings of Deaf, mental health counselors, social workers in the vocational rehabilitation field, grassroots community members, college professors, business owners, non-profit organizers, interpreters, and many more in the spectrum of the Deaf community. They knew the bill was not balanced and catered to special interest groups. The only thing they did and do not have: money. Read more ..
The Ground Zero Mosque
|Gregg Rickman||August 23rd 2010|
Cutting Edge Human Rights Analyst
As it happened, a small building became available on the Washington, D.C. real estate market. The place, 101 Raoul Wallenberg Place Southwest, was a small two-story, brick building and historic at that. Cozy and well-placed, the building was perfectly suited to accommodate its new owner’s plans. The new owner, the Aryan Nations, seeks to use the site as a cultural center to house its new Pastor of the Church of the Sons of Yahweh. Known for its commitment to white nationalism and neo-Nazism, and, of course, anti-Semitism, the Aryan Nations has a long and evil history. Seeking to establish its Christian identified base there sounded like a perfect opportunity to branch out from its Louisiana base—next door to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Owners of 101 Raoul Wallenberg, claiming religious justification and status, approached and received the proper, lengthy approval of the District of Columbia Zoning Commission, and Aryan Nations was set to move in and open up their new religious establishment, whose protections are guaranteed by our constitution. While there was great consternation on the part of the Zoning Commission, claiming religious status sealed the deal for them to move in. Read more ..
Turkey and Israel
|Daniel Pipes||August 16th 2010|
Middle East Forum
|Cyprus Forbidden Zone|
In light of Ankara’s recent criticism of what it calls Israel’s “open-air jail” in Gaza, July 20, which marks the anniversary of Turkey’s invasion of Cyprus, has special relevance.
Turkish policy toward Israel, historically warm and only a decade ago approaching full alliance, has cooled since Islamists took power in Ankara in 2002. Their hostility became explicit in January 2009, during the Israel–Hamas war. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan grandly condemned Israeli policies as “perpetrating inhuman actions which would bring it to self-destruction” and even invoked God (“Allah will … punish those who transgress the rights of innocents”). His wife, Emine Erdoğan, hyperbolically condemned Israeli actions as so awful they “cannot be expressed in words.”
Their verbal assaults augured a further hostility that included insulting the Israeli president, helping sponsor the “Freedom Flotilla,” and recalling the Turkish ambassador.
This Turkish rage prompts a question: Is Israel in Gaza really worse than Turkey in Cyprus? A comparison finds this hardly to be so. Consider some contrasts: Read more ..
Media on the Edge
|Rachel Ehrenfeld||August 16th 2010|
American Center for Democracy
Most prosaically, the SPEECH Act stands for the creative but unwieldy title of the Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act, enacted in July to combat the chilling effects of libel tourism on American free speech. Among other protective measures, the SPEECH Act allows American authors and publishers sued in foreign jurisdictions to block the enforcement of a libel judgment that would not have been awarded if had it been brought in American courts.
The SPEECH Act also stands for the unanimous affirmation of our Congress that the United States will no longer tolerate the threat of libel tourism to our Constitutional protections, our national security, and our core democratic freedoms.
As the initiator of the SPEECH Act and a broader anti-libel tourism movement in the United States, I believe that the Act also stands for the proposition that the individual is still a powerful and potent force in this world Read more ..
The Political Edge
|Star Parker||August 8th 2010|
Cutting Edge commentator
Talk about racism may help employment for those in the race business but it has little relevance to getting the American economy working again, which is what we should be single-mindedly focused on. Can anyone tell me why suddenly race is the hot topic of national discourse?
According to Gallup polling of last week, the issues most on the minds of Americans are the economy and jobs followed by dissatisfaction with all aspects of government. I didn’t notice racism on the list anywhere.
The NAACP says it was “snookered” by Fox News on the Shirley Sherrod story. I say we’ve all been snookered by the NAACP.
The NAACP has shown that those who have written this organization off as irrelevant are wrong. It demonstrated this past week that if it so chooses it can dominate the national discussion with its racial agenda, regardless of what the real pressing issues of national concern may be.
The accusation about Tea Party racism is ridiculous. But even if you don’t think it’s ridiculous, is this the discussion we need to be having when national unemployment hovers at ten percent, and when black unemployment is closer to 15 percent, double that of whites? Now, of course, we should be talking about racism if this is what is driving black unemployment. But is it? I don’t think so. Nor do most blacks. Read more ..
Economic Jihad Against Israel
|Juda Engelmayer||August 2nd 2010|
Cutting Edge Contributor
Embargos have taken place throughout history, but boycotts have been waged universally attempting to compel a person, entity or even an entire country to change a course of action. Since the term “boycott” was first coined in 1880 Ireland as a way to nonviolently coerce landowner Charles Cunningham Boycott to undo his eviction decree, they have since taken place .
In the history of boycotts, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the American boycott of British goods prior to the American Revolution, the anti-Nazi boycott waged during the Hitler regime, and the boycott of South African investments during the 1980s, to name a few successful ones, were meant to overturn offensive, oppressive rules. Yet, none of these was actually intended to destroy the entity, but to move it away from its current path.
The boycott of Jewish-owned businesses in Nazi Germany during the 1930s was very different, as the world discovered later. It was used by Hitler as a means of destroying the Jewish community and expelling them from Germany. Those pages from Hitler’s playbook appear to have been adopted by a group of pro-Palestinian activists (see video) who call themselves the “Boycott Divestment and Sanctions Movement" (BDS). Read more ..
The Obama Edge
|Armstrong Williams||July 26th 2010|
Cutting Edge Commentator
The White House has had a few laughs recently, poking fun at RNC Chairman Michael Steele. The most recent gaffe they’re pointing to is Steele’s comment surrounding Afghanistan and the possibility the war cannot be won. White House operatives lit up the Internet with charges and accusations that Steele and his GOP friends were ready to throw in the towel while troops were still on the ground. Never mind that when similar arguments were made during candidate Obama’s campaign, Democrats howled in protest and stumbled over themselves to appear “patriotic.”
But such shenanigans have no real place in this debate and war that has been ongoing now for close to a decade. The political back-and-forth is about as impressive as the stops and starts regarding America’s policy in Afghanistan, and that must change first if we’re ever going to bring our soldiers home. If Iraq was Bush’s Achilles heel, for all our sakes we pray that Afghanistan will not be Obama’s. Only real commitment can change the course of history—commitment unconstrained by timelines and driven by a real sense of purpose.
What further complicates the White House’s views toward Afghanistan was the politically-charged promise President Obama made to the American people while campaigning in 2008. Sensing the electorate’s frustrations toward Iraq, and to a lesser extent, Afghanistan, Obama said he would begin bringing our troops home from Afghanistan by 2011. To be more precise, that’s July of next year, almost one year to the date. And if anything, the prospects of securing any sort of peace in the region are worsening, not improving. Read more ..
The Obama Edge
|Andrew Bostom||July 19th 2010|
Cutting Edge commentator
|counterterrorism adviser John Brennan|
A dry pun asks, "When is a door not a door?" - the answer being, "When it is ajar." But dry humor is clearly preferable to the deluded warping of the lexicon by the Obama administration's lead counterterrorism adviser, John Brennan, which leads to this question, and requisite answer, "When is jihad not jihad?" - "When it is bloodless, spiritual struggle." Mr. Brennan vociferously advocates an exclusive, bowdlerized definition of jihad in the public discourse as "to purify oneself or one's community," lest the tender sensibilities of Muslims be offended. He further claims that, somehow, self-described jihadists "have truly just distorted the whole concept" of jihad. But it is Mr. Brennan who, irrespective of whatever flimsy, a historical rationale he provides, thoroughly misrepresents jihad - a living, bellicose Islamic institution that dates from the advent of the Muslim creed almost 14 centuries ago.
The dangerous absurdity of Mr. Brennan's jihad denial is self-evident: More than 15,600 jihad terror attacks have been committed by Muslims worldwide since the cataclysmic acts of jihad terrorism committed against the United States itself on Sept. 11, 2001. These data should remind us that there is just one historically relevant meaning of jihad, despite contemporary apologetics. Jahada, the root of the word jihad, appears 40 times in the Koran. With four exceptions, all the other 36 usages in the Koran, as understood by both the greatest jurists and scholars of classical Islam (including Abu Yusuf, Averroes, Ibn Khaldun and Al Ghazali) and ordinary Muslims - meant and mean "he fought, warred or waged war against unbelievers and the like." Read more ..
Freedom of Religion
|Gregg Rickman||July 19th 2010|
Cutting Edge human rights analyst
It seems a commonplace these days now to compare Islamophobia and anti-Semitism as equal forms of intolerance. Fighting Islamophobia, as the argument goes, helps the fight against anti-Semitism. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
“Accommodation of Muslims and their religious aspirations in the Western world would create space for political and social harmony,” declared Masood Khan of Pakistan, representing the Organization of the Islamic Conference at the United Nations Human Rights Council on September 25, 2007. Masood offered a deliberate falsehood repeated by Muslims across Europe, the Middle East, and in the U.S. suggesting, “Islamophobia was also a crude form of anti-Semitism.” He also commented that “[a]s Cathedrals adorned the skylines in many Muslim Countries, so should Minarets.”
In the past twenty years, Europe has changed dramatically. Muslim immigration has expanded exponentially, changing the atmosphere and climate of Europe like never before. Writing about the appearance of Brussels, Saudi Arab News daily Aijaz Zaka Syed explained almost jubilantly, “This is the heart of Europe, the seat of the European Parliament, and perhaps the capital of the coming United States of Europe.” He continued,
“With Arabs and Muslims living and working in this quintessentially European city, Brussels increasingly looks like Beirut, Istanbul, or any other great city of the Middle East… And it is not just Brussels. Scenes like these are increasingly familiar all across Europe—from London to Paris and from Berlin to Copenhagen to Amsterdam.” Read more ..
|David Suissa||July 12th 2010|
I love Peter Beinart. The last time we had breakfast, in Washington, D.C., about a year and a half ago, our conversation got so lively that I think someone asked us to quiet down. We don't see eye to eye on everything, but I've been moved by his compelling logic and sense of fairness in the many opinion pieces he has written over the years.
Not so with his latest, much-discussed piece, titled "The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment," in The New York Review of Books. The essay is sprawling and cleverly written; you feel you are reading something important that is revealing a big truth.
My problem, though, is that once I got over the drama, I found myself asking questions like, "What exactly does he want the Jewish establishment to do?" Read more ..
Edge on Sports
|Martyn Drakard||July 5th 2010|
Cutting Edge Africa Correspondent
With the defeat of Ghana, by penalties to Uruguay, and Brazil not making it to the World Cup semi-finals, the mood in Africa is somber. Few expected Africa to win the Cup, but the hopes of many were that one African team might beat the jinx and get through to the semi-finals; especially since the tournament was being played in South Africa, the first time on African soil. Somehow, according to traditional beliefs, the ancestors would show their pleasure by ensuring the victory for us.
So, what’s wrong with African soccer? African players are stars in Europe, so why not here? Or rather, what’s wrong with African coaches, asks Uganda’s Saturday Monitor, (July 3, 2010), since most African teams are coached by expatriates, elderly White men, who, despite their generous pay, don’t deliver. Why not hire local men who understand the local conditions and know the players better? Is it because the ‘elderly White men” don’t have the skill and experience or command respect? According to a former coach, Moses Basena, the “problem is the skin. Naturally we still look at Whites as a superior force.” Read more ..
The Obama Edge
|Gregg Rickman||July 5th 2010|
Cutting Edge human rights analyst
|Hannah Rosenthal |
Last December, the Obama Administration's Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat anti-Semitism Hannah Rosenthal attacked Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren for not toeing the J-Street line regarding his own country thereby taking J-Street's soft approach to terrorism against Israel. In March, in London at the Community Security Trust Dinner, while ostensibly discussing her work on anti-Semitism, she called for more effort in the fight against Islamaphobia. And most recently, in Kazakhstan at a meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), she again called for increased work to fight the problem. I am confused. Is she the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism or Islamaphobia? Read more ..
Edge of Justice
|Nathan Lewin and Guy Cook||June 28th 2010|
U.S. Attorney Stephanie Rose has decided that "silence is no longer in order" and has opted to defend her prosecution of Sholom Rubashkin in an open letter in the Des Moines Register that was also widely distributed to the media in general.
It is surprising that a United States Attorney takes offense at the exercise of First Amendment rights by American citizens who support Mr. Rubashkin and publicly denounce how he has been treated. Rose has opened the propriety of her conduct to discussion in the media, particularly since her letter makes many assertions that are false and were never proved or tested in court.
Mr. Rubashkin's principal appellate counsel, who criticized her in a letter to the Department of Justice's Assistant Attorney General, is a co-author of this response to her open letter. We now challenge US Attorney Rose to debate Mr. Lewin on the propriety of the prosecution in a public session, hopefully televised, in Des Moines at a mutually agreeable date with a mutually agreed moderator. Read more ..
The Hamas Flotilla
|Brigitte Gabriel||June 21st 2010|
As world organizations, nations and international media rally together in their favorite cause célèbre of vilifying Israel the Gaza flotilla attack, the country finds itself again on the defensive, trying to explain to the world why it instituted the blockade of Gaza and what part the terrorist organization Hamas is playing in that blockade.
Hamas’ stated goal is to wipe Israel off the map. In fact, in Palestinian schoolbooks and maps Israel is nonexistent. Hamas has many sympathizers who share its goals politically and ideologically, most notably al-Qaida and Iran. Both are welcomed in Gaza with open arms and are creative in supporting Hamas and smuggling weapons in support of their holy war against the Jewish state. This latest incident, though, sheds light on another ally of the terrorist group, the Turkish-based International Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH).
So who are these poor “humanitarian” activists Israel tried to stop on the flotilla?
IHH is an associate of Hamas and a member of the Union of the Good. This Union is headed by Yousef Al Qaradawi, one of the world’s most notorious Islamic terrorists (banned in England and America) and leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. IHH was already involved in the purchasing of automatic weapons from other militant Islamic groups as far back as 1990 when their President Bulent Yildrim was focused on recruiting “Veteran soldiers in anticipation of the coming Holy war [jihad].” Read more ..
The BP Spill
|By Carolyn Moynihan||June 21st 2010|
|BP CEO Tony Hayward|
It has been an eventful week in the 60-day history of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster. President Obama delivered a solemn speech from the Oval Office to the nation. The head honchos of BP arrived in Washington with apologies to the American people and agreed to a $20 billion compensation fund for people whose livelihoods have been affected. The British company’s chief executive, Tony Hayward, has fronted up to Congress and admitted that the explosion and sinking of the oil rig “never should have happened” but that “we are unwavering in our commitment to fulfill all our responsibilities.”
Responsibility is a key word in this crisis, although the specifics of whom it attaches to have been elusive. During his grilling by Congressional committees yesterday Hayward stuck to a prepared script and answered many questions with “I can’t answer that question,” “I can’t recall,” “That’s a decision I was not party to,” and “I don’t know.” “I’m not stonewalling,” he told one questioner, “I simply was not involved in the decision-making process.” Why, after almost two months, doesn’t he know these things? Read more ..
Edge on Genocide
|Lior Zagury||June 21st 2010|
|Turkish Market Poster Stating No Dogs or Israelis|
My name is Lior Zagury and I am a very proud Israeli Jew who says, "Don't Let History Repeat Itself."
Yes, it is important for me to present myself in this way, especially today when the feeling is there is a festival for anti-Semites.
There are now signs saying "We don’t receive dogs & Israelis."
Such signs are not from the streets of Berlin in 1933 when the Nazis came to power, not from the neighborhoods of Warsaw in 1941 when the Jews lived in the Ghetto, and not even from the shops of Kielce after the second world war in 1946, just before the pogrom that made Jews understand that there isn’t a safe place for them and they need to leave Europe.
These signs have been posted at the entrance to big markets and offices in Turkey in the past few days. Similar signs were hung in Jordan. Read more ..
Mendoza Against the Deaf
|Edwin Black||June 14th 2010|
California eugenics has a direct link to Nazi Germany’s war of extermination against Jews and all other Europeans deemed less worthy than the Aryan master race. In the first two decades of the twentieth century, American eugenics launched a campaign to create a white, blue-eyed, blond-haired master race in America, a biological ideal they called “Nordic.” A key center for the pseudoscience of eugenics sprang up in California. It was from California that eugenicists, backed by wealthy philanthropies such as the Carnegie Institution, created racist pseudo-medical brochures and proposed legislation to eliminate the existence of all people on earth who did not resemble the Nordic ideal.
How? Eugenicists wanted to create public gas chambers, marriage prohibition, concentration camps, and other elimination strategies for those perceived as “disabled” or less than the eugenic version of perfect. Legislation was crafted to slowly implement their goals on a state-by-state level.
Euthanasia laws were introduced in Ohio by the social worker professions as early as 1908—and defeated. Marriage restriction and concentration camp confinement laws for those with vision problems were proffered in New York by the ophthalmology profession—and defeated.
But through an extensive and pernicious campaign of fake science and academic fraud at the highest echelon, eugenicists were able to achieve forced sterilization laws in twenty-seven states. Ultimately, some 65,000 Americans were coercively sterilized, many without knowing it. Often the reasons were no more than gossip about moral character, presumed illiteracy, poverty, or the commission of a petty economic crime. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws and over the coming few decades, about a third, and sometimes more, of all these 65,000 forced sterilizations occurred in California. In 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations were performed in the state, 700 on women. Read more ..
The Helen Thomas Affair
|Sara K. Eisen||June 14th 2010|
Here’s the thing. I’ve been thinking about poor Helen Thomas, who I believe was probably just saying what everyone thinks and has therefore been made a scapegoat. Not that I really care, because we ought to share the scapegoat status once in a while. It’s the least we can do to dispel the stereotype that we are stingy, us irritating Jews.
Irritating enough, apparently - like the too-talented and too-bossy fame-hog Rachel Berry on Glee - in our discovery of the written word, monotheism, modern physics, psychology, vaccinations, and the film industry, that every country that has ever “hosted” us has found it necessary to tell us to get the hell out, like Thomas did. (Ironically, the aforementioned Jewish Glee character Rachel, in a particularly annoying moment in one episode, was told by classmates to move to Israel. I doubt the writers coordinated this telling joke with the State Department - sorry J Street, Jews do equal Israel in the eyes of the world.)
Helen, you know why we were in Germany and much of Eastern Europe in the first place? And by the way, if I follow your advice, do you think the nice old ladies who got my grandmothers’ large houses and farms from the Nazis in what was once Czechoslovakia will kick the property back two generations? That would be cool because I’d love a vineyard and an agricultural estate.
Well, we were in Germany and Hungary and Czechoslovakia and Russia (where we were regularly just plain killed by Cossacks), and also, for many centuries, Poland (ditto), because we were told to get the hell out of England, France, and Spain. Or, you know, just plain killed by handsome and heroic fairytale knights. Read more ..
Mendoza Against the Deaf
|Kevin Clark and Tim Riker||June 7th 2010|
AB 2072, a California bill introduced in February 2010 by Assembly Member Tony Mendoza (D- Norwalk) has created uproar among parents and the deaf community because private oral school affiliates of the Alexander Graham Bell Association, an organization with a history of eugenics and social engineering, and the Oberkotter Foundation are behind this bill. The bill passed the Assembly on April 29, 2010, and is currently in the Senate Health Committee awaiting vote on June 16, 2010. The deaf community believes that the bill circumvents existing newborn hearing screening law in a way that it will promote audism, which is prejudice against people who cannot hear and speak, and will marginalize American Sign Language. The Assembly Health Committee analysis states, “According to the author, with new developments in Cochlear Implants, more profoundly deaf children are able to hear and speak and can be completely assimilated into society.”
Many in the deaf community do not perceive their inability to hear or speak as a disability. Rather, they perceive themselves as a variety of the human race in much the same way a person with different hair or eye color. Since American Sign Language was recognized as a language by Dr. William Stokoe in 1965, signed languages have gradually been recognized as a language equal to spoken languages. Hundreds of other signed languages used by deaf people have been identified all around the world and deaf people are recognized as a linguistic and cultural minority group. A survey by the Modern Language Association in 2002 shows that American Sign Language is one of the fastest growing languages offered at colleges and universities, with a growth of 432.8 percent from 1998 to 2002. Read more ..
The Hamas Flotilla
|Gregg Rickman||June 7th 2010|
|Israeli Commandos Under Stun Grenade Attack|
On May 31, 2010, six ships of the so-called “Freedom Flotilla” destined for Gaza were stopped by Israel’s Navy off the coast in the Mediterranean Sea. Five of the ships heeded the call, one however the Mavi Maramara refused, precipitating a forced boarding by troops from Israel’s Navy.
Each soldier who descended from the helicopter was taken by three or four men and the crowd simply exploded, beating them up, reported one Marine. "They lynched us," said one. Another stated, "They had metal clubs, knives, slingshots, glass bottles." At one point there was also live fire. This flotilla was a provocation. Because the armed provocateurs filmed the operation for their own propaganda purposes, the world got to see the humanitarians in action. They got to see that the Freedom Flotilla was really a "Terrorist Flotilla" aimed at Israel’s right to exist.
On the Mavi Maramara was a group of some 50 mercenaries, trained for fighting and spread throughout the ship awaiting the assault by Israeli troops. According the IDF, the members of this violent group lacked identity cards and were not carrying passports. Instead, each carried an envelope of some $10,000 in cash. There is possible evidence that this force received support from within the Turkish government itself. Read more ..
|Robert Spencer||May 31st 2010|
Now that it has been revealed that not one, but two mosques are planned for the area around Ground Zero, the supremacist and triumphalist character of this effort is clearer than ever. Is the Muslim population of lower Manhattan so huge that one projected mosque—even one so large as to be housed within a 15 story Islamic Center—would immediately be bursting at the seams, and thus yet another is required even before the first is built?
Of course not. Muslims are already praying at the projected site of the massive Islamic Center, an old Burlington Coat Factory outlet that was damaged by a piece of one of the hijacked airplanes fell through the roof on 9/11. (A Muslim real estate company paid $4.85 million in cash for the building. Where that cash came from has not been explained).
That building doesn’t appear to be overflowing, although Muslims are reportedly holding prayers on the sidewalk outside another lower Manhattan mosque, apparently in order to give the impression that they’re in dire need of more space. This is, however, more for show than for necessity. Read more ..
|Michael Cook||May 24th 2010|
Take two of the most combustible issues of our time, feminism and Islam. Mix. Shake. Pour. Duck.
This is more or less what happened last week when the bioethics committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics revised its long-standing opposition to female genital mutilation. Up to now, the AAP’s position was simple: never. In the United States, as in many other countries, opposition has been reinforced with legislation. One American father has been sentenced to 10 years in jail for cutting his two-year-old daughter.
But after years of experience with emigré communities from places like Somalia and Sudan, the AAP decided that absolute refusal to cooperate could do more harm than good. Parents have taken their daughters back to the home country where the procedure might be done in septic conditions without anesthetic, sometimes with scissors or a shard of glass. Read more ..
See Earlier Stories 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51